Connecting risk signals before they become operational disruption.
Your systems already identify the signals. Most organizations still can’t connect them before they become operational disruptions.
A new survey of 203 EHS, Process Safety, and Operations leaders across the US, UK, Australia, and UAE reveals what’s driving this gap: major events rarely start with one dramatic failure – they build through an accumulation of conditions across operational, process-safety, and governance systems that each look manageable on their own. Together, they form a pattern that stays invisible until it becomes an incident, a shutdown, or a production delay.
Inside the report
This report breaks down what’s really happening inside today’s process-safety operations, and how Dynamic Risk Exposure Intelligence closes the gap.
- The cost of the gap is operational, not theoretical – 97% experienced at least one operational disruption or production delay in the past 12 months because risk conditions were recognized later than desired
- Manual correlation is still the norm even where systems are connected – 93% of respondents whose systems aren’t fully integrated spend at least an hour a week manually stitching together MoCs, permits, maintenance records and barrier status
- The market isn’t asking “should we use AI” anymore; it’s asking “on what terms” – 88% say it’s important that AI provides recommendations while humans make the final decision
Fill out the form to download the report
