We have all seen how, despite reductions in travel and consumption as a result of our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Greenland ice sheet is melting at a faster rate than ever before and how wildfires have raged throughout California, Oregon and Washington state among many other locations worldwide. Now, the goal of achieving net zero emission reduction targets is all the more prescient for the planet.
Even institutional investors, like BlackRock and Primco, are forcing many of the companies they invest in to commit to net-zero targets. And governing bodies, such as the EU and states like California, have greatly restricted fossil-fuel-burning mobility while placing higher prices on carbon emissions.
In this changing global context, companies are often taking the lead by setting their own net-zero emissions goals. Some of the largest and most successful international companies are taking the goal of drastically reducing their emissions very seriously. Just to name a few, IKEA, Walmart, BASF, VW, Mahindra, Bayer and Microsoft all have clear decarbonization strategies and specific emission reduction targets and deadlines, quantified and announced publicly.
When it comes to assessing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or the carbon footprints of products, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a powerful tool that provides a baseline, gives insights into scope 3 emissions and helps facilitate a strategy for emissions reductions. Within an LCA, the quality of the underlying Life Cycle Inventory (LCI), including data about materials, processes, energy and transport, is crucial to producing valuable and reliable results. But what should companies actually look for when searching for the right data to act as a basis for a comprehensive assessment of their products and processes?
In conducting a carbon footprint analysis for a particular product, companies need accurate, product specific LCA datasets, preferably from one consistent LCA database. They need frequently updated datasets, based on information and knowhow from their particular industry and region, that are designed for compliance with multiple LCA standards and norms. For example, the electricity grid mix in Germany in 2008 (0,623 kg CO2 Equiv. / 1 kWh) was 10% higher in GHG emissions than in 2016 (0,563 kg CO2 Equiv. / 1 kWh), mainly because of the higher percentage of coal and the low share of renewable energy sources in the mix in 2008 (Source: Sphera’s LCA databases GaBi).