Learn the difference between the CSDDD and CSRD, and how should you focus your efforts moving forward.

What is the difference between the CSDDD and CSRD, and how should you focus your efforts?

The EU’s recent Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) are closely linked, with both pieces of legislation working together to reinforce each other. But what is the difference between the two pieces of legislation?

In a nutshell:

The CSDDD focuses on mandatory Human Rights and Environmental supply chain due diligence for companies. The Directive requires setting up Due Diligence processes in order to identify adverse impacts. This includes:

Establish a due diligence policy

Assess, identify, and evaluate risks, and implement mitigation strategies

Create and outline mitigation and prevention action plans

Set up grievance mechanisms for addressing human rights and environmental concerns related to company operations

Vs.

The CSRD covers the reporting phase of the CSDDD in accordance with EU sustainability reporting standards for companies that are within scope of both pieces of legislation. This includes:

Implement detailed non-financial reporting procedures

Comply with mandatory EU sustainability reporting standards

Where should you put your focus now?

To ensure compliance with reporting obligations, many companies are motivated to establish Human Rights Due Diligence and Environmental business practices as their initial step, enabling them to effectively report their activities.

To effectively prepare, concentrating on the CSDDD can result in greater returns on supply chain sustainability investments, offering long-term benefits and simultaneously addressing the urgent requirement for public transparency and visibility. For most companies, the major work will be in establishing the Human Rights Due Diligence and Environmental business practices so that you have a process in place that allows your company to best understand these issues. This work involves assessing suppliers, identifying risk, and creating a framework that allows for the adoption of policies, adherence to procedures, and implementation of improvements.

Sphera provides solutions that companies can start to use straight away as a means of identifying and mitigating risk. Reporting will follow, but the activity needs to be started in an authentic, systematized, and automated manner that minimizes supplier data error and drives supplier engagement.

 

SupplyShift was acquired by Sphera in January 2024. This content originally appeared on the SupplyShift website and was slightly modified for sphera.com.

Latest insights from Sphera

Abstract view of an office building with many convex windows from below
EmpCo is live: what companies can do to make environmental and sustainability claims defensible

EmpCo is live: what companies can do to make environmental and sustainability claims defensible

Biodiversity loss is a growing supply chain and business risk. Learn how to assess nature-related dependencies with TNFD,…
October 29, 2026
Photovoltaic with cloudy sky reflection
Are your mitigation and adaptation plans working together?

Are your mitigation and adaptation plans working together?

Learn how CMIP7 emissions scenarios change climate risk analysis and what companies should do now to test resilience…
October 29, 2026
Abstract blue and black gradient pattern with a soft metallic mesh texture. The clean, modern design features a diagonal dark background
Amer Sports strengthens global sustainability data governance and GHG emissions accuracy with Sphera

Amer Sports strengthens global sustainability data governance and GHG emissions accuracy with Sphera

Duke Energy creates a trusted data foundation and governance across EHS, chemical management and sustainability with Sphera
October 29, 2026