Learn the difference between the CSDDD and CSRD, and how should you focus your efforts moving forward.

What is the difference between the CSDDD and CSRD, and how should you focus your efforts?

The EU’s recent Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) are closely linked, with both pieces of legislation working together to reinforce each other. But what is the difference between the two pieces of legislation?

In a nutshell:

The CSDDD focuses on mandatory Human Rights and Environmental supply chain due diligence for companies. The Directive requires setting up Due Diligence processes in order to identify adverse impacts. This includes:

Establish a due diligence policy

Assess, identify, and evaluate risks, and implement mitigation strategies

Create and outline mitigation and prevention action plans

Set up grievance mechanisms for addressing human rights and environmental concerns related to company operations

Vs.

The CSRD covers the reporting phase of the CSDDD in accordance with EU sustainability reporting standards for companies that are within scope of both pieces of legislation. This includes:

Implement detailed non-financial reporting procedures

Comply with mandatory EU sustainability reporting standards

Where should you put your focus now?

To ensure compliance with reporting obligations, many companies are motivated to establish Human Rights Due Diligence and Environmental business practices as their initial step, enabling them to effectively report their activities.

To effectively prepare, concentrating on the CSDDD can result in greater returns on supply chain sustainability investments, offering long-term benefits and simultaneously addressing the urgent requirement for public transparency and visibility. For most companies, the major work will be in establishing the Human Rights Due Diligence and Environmental business practices so that you have a process in place that allows your company to best understand these issues. This work involves assessing suppliers, identifying risk, and creating a framework that allows for the adoption of policies, adherence to procedures, and implementation of improvements.

Sphera provides solutions that companies can start to use straight away as a means of identifying and mitigating risk. Reporting will follow, but the activity needs to be started in an authentic, systematized, and automated manner that minimizes supplier data error and drives supplier engagement.

 

SupplyShift was acquired by Sphera in January 2024. This content originally appeared on the SupplyShift website and was slightly modified for sphera.com.

Latest insights from Sphera

UK Sustainability Reporting Standards (UK SRS): What Investors Expect and Companies Should Do Next

UK Sustainability Reporting Standards (UK SRS): What Investors Expect and Companies Should Do Next

The UK SRS are here. Align your reporting with ISSB standards and the new S1 and S2 frameworks…
April 7, 2026
The ESRS Reset: What Really Changed and What Didn’t

The ESRS Reset: What Really Changed and What Didn’t

ESRS updates cut data points by 60%, shifting the focus to professional judgment and materiality. See how to…
April 6, 2026
Why companies need to start implementing climate transition plans now​

Why companies need to start implementing climate transition plans now​

Move from climate ambition to business transformation. Learn why IFRS S2, CSRD, and TPT make quantified transition planning…
April 2, 2026