Abstract
Purpose
Most life cycle inventories (LCIs) of electricity consumed in different regions of the USA disregard the power that is being traded between these regions, while the US EPA’s eGRID database does not contain scope 3 or noncombustion emissions. The relevance of these omissions has not yet been comprehensively quantified in the literature. This paper aims to close this knowledge gap.
Methods
The parameterized inventory models that underlie all publicly available grid mix datasets in the GaBi databases were configured to create 26 eGRID subregional LCIs based on data from EPA’s eGRID2014 database and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s FERC-714 report on power trade for the same reference year. Results were calculated regarding climate change, acidification, eutrophication, particulate matter, smog formation, and blue water consumption per kilowatt hour of electricity and compared for direct plant emissions only, the cradle-to-gate production mix (including scope 3), and the cradle-to-gate consumption mix (including scope 3 and power imports).
Results and discussion
Results showed that the scope 3 burdens represent the most significant data gap if not accounted for. Specifically, the GWP results show median increases of around + 18% for GWP100 and of + 30% for GWP20 when scope 3 GHG emissions are added to the direct plant emissions. Other impact categories showed even larger increases when compared to direct plant emissions, with a maximum increase of + 573% in eutrophication potential for the subregion CAMX. While the median deviations of the consumption mixes compared to the production mixes are moderate, individual subregions show significant increases in environmental burdens for selected metrics. However, power trade seems less of an issue for the impact category of climate change as only the CAMX subregion shows an increase larger than 10% when power trade is accounted for.
Conclusions
A cradle-to-gate production mix can be a suitable proxy of the environmental burdens of electricity consumed in many subregions, but it can also lead to significant errors for others depending on the environmental metric(s) one is trying to assess. Power plant emissions by themselves (scope 2) that exclude both scope 3 emissions and power trade cannot be recommended for use in any kind of carbon accounting or other environmental analysis because they suffer from severe data gaps and may skew the comparison of the environmental burdens associated with power consumption in the different subregions significantly.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The subregion NYUP contains one power plant in eGRID2014 that is not controlled by NYIS, but it contributes less than 1 ‰ to the net annual generation of the NYUP subregion and was therefore disregarded in this context.
References
AA (2013) The environmental footprint of semi-finished aluminum products in North America. The Aluminum Association, Arlington Retrieved fromhttp://www.aluminum.org/sites/default/files/LCA_Report_Aluminum_Association_12_13.pdf
Apple (2017) iPhone X environmental report. Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA Retrieved March 9, 2018, from https://images.apple.com/environment/pdf/products/iphone/iPhone_X_PER_sept2017.pdf
Bauer C, Treyer K, Itten R, Frischknecht R (2012) Electricity generation & supply in ecoinvent v3. Paul Scherrer Institute, Villingen
Colett J, Kelly J, Keoleian G (2016) Using nested average electricity allocation protocols to characterize electrical grids in life cycle assessment: A case study of U.S. primary aluminum production. J Ind Ecol 20(1):29–41
Diem A, Quiroz C (2012) How to use eGRID for carbon footprinting electricity purchases in greenhouse gas emission inventories. International emission inventory conference. Tampa: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved March 12, 2018, from https://www3.epa.gov/ttnchie1/conference/ei20/session3/adiem.pdf
DoE (2015) Form no. 714—annual electric balancing authority area and planning area report. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy DoE (n.d.) Learn more about interconnections. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from https://www.energy.gov/oe/services/electricity-policy-coordination-and-implementation/transmission-planning/recovery-act-0
EC (2012) Product environmental footprint (PEF) guide. Deliverable 2 and 4A of the Administrative Arrangement between DG Environment and the Joint Research Centre No N 070307/2009/552517, including Amendment No 1 from December 2010. Joint Research Center (JRC). Ispra: European Commission. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/footprint/PEF%20methodology%20final%20draft.pdf
EIA (2017) Form EIA-860 detailed data. Retrieved September 9, 2017, from https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia860/
EPA (2012) EPA/600/R-12/554—tool for reduction and assessment of chemicals and other environmental impacts (TRACI) TRACI version 2.1—user’s guide. Retrieved March 29, 2018, from tool for reduction and assessment of chemicals and other environmental impacts (TRACI): https://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P100HN53.pdf
EPA (2016a) EPA’s report on the environment (ROE). Retrieved March 9, 2018, from https://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/
EPA (2016b) Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2014. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA (2016c) Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID). Retrieved September 9, 2017, from https://www.epa.gov/energy/emissions-generation-resource-integrated-database-egrid
EPA (2017a) eGRID subregion representational map. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from https://www.epa.gov/energy/egrid-subregion-representational-map
EPA (2017b) Technical support document for eGRID with year 2014 data. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-02/documents/egrid2014_technicalsupportdocument_v2.pdf
EPA (2017c) eGRID2014v2 summary tables. Retrieved March 28, 2018, from eGRID 2014 summary tables: https://www.epa.gov/energy/egrid-2014-summary-tables
FERC (2017). Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Retrieved May 9, 2018, from electric power markets: New York (NYISO): https://www.ferc.gov/market-oversight/mkt-electric/new-york.asp
Google (2018) Product environmental reports. Retrieved March 16, 2018, from https://store.google.com/us/magazine/sustainability?hl=en-US
IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013—the physical science basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Bern Retrieved from http://www.climatechange2013.org/
ISO (2006) ISO 14044—environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
JRC (2013) Background analysis of the quality of the energy data to be considered for the European Reference Life Cycle Database (ELCD). Ispra: European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/background-analysis-energy-data-be-considered-european-reference-life-cycle-database-elcd
Koffler C, Stoffregen A, Diem A, Hwang I (2013) Production, consumption, or utility mix: does it really matter? ACLCA LCA XIII, Orlando
Koffler C, Wang J, Buxmann K (2016) Comment on “Using nested average electricity allocation protocols to characterize electrical grids in life cycle assessment: a case study of U.S. primary aluminum production”. J Ind Ecol 20(4):950–952
Lexmark (2017) Environmental product declaration laser printer CS921DE. Lexmark International Inc., Lexington, KY Retrieved March 9, 20178, from https://csr.lexmark.com/env-epd_2_722177639.pdf
NREL (2013) U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from https://www.nrel.gov/lci/
NYPA. (n.d.). The Niagara Power Project. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from https://www.nypa.gov/power/generation/niagara-power-project thinkstep (2018a) GaBi Database & Modeling Principles. Leinfelden-Echterdingen: thinkstep AG. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from http://www.gabi-software.com/fileadmin/Documents/GaBi_Modelling_Principles_2018.pdf
thinkstep (2018b) GaBi database documentation. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from http://www.gabi-software.com/international/support/gabi/
thinkstep (2018c) GaBi databases 2018 edition—upgrades and improvements. Leinfelden-Echterdingen: thinkstep AG. Retrieved from http://www.gabi-software.com/fileadmin/GaBi_Databases/Database_Upgrade_2018_Upgrades_and_improvements.pdf
thinkstep (2018d) Energy modelling in GaBi—2018 edition. Retrieved March 15, 2018, from http://www.gabi-software.com/fileadmin/Documents/Energy_modelling_in_GaBi.pdf
thinkstep (2018e) Retrieved May 2, 2018, from process data set: electricity grid mix; AC, technology mix; consumption mix, to consumer; <1kV (en): http://gabi-documentation-2018.gabi-software.com/xml-data/processes/69e79b16-bb66-41aa-8d2f-aacdfb84d42a.xml
Trane (2015) Environmental product declarations—centrifugal chillers. Davidson, NC: Ingersoll Rand Inc. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from https://spot.ulprospector.com/en/na/BuiltEnvironment/Detail/32790/683424/Centrifugal-Chiller
Treyer K, Bauer C (2016) Life cycle inventories of electricity generation and power supply in version 3 of the ecoinvent database—part II: electricity markets. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(9):1255–1268
USBR (2016) Grand Culee Dam. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from https://www.usbr.gov/pn/grandcoulee/
Weber C, Jaramillo P, Marriott J, Samaras C (2010) Life cycle assessment and grid electricity: what do we know and what can we know? Environ Sci Technol 44:1895–1901
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Travis Johnson, EPA, and the whole eGRID team for their support and feedback in analyzing the eGRID data. No official U.S. Environmental Protection Agency endorsement should be inferred from these acknowledgements. EPA does not endorse the purchase or sale of any commercial products or services.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Yi Yang
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koffler, C., Hengstler, J., Thellier, L. et al. On the relevance of scope 3 emissions and power trade for regional life cycle inventories of electricity consumption in the USA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24, 1360–1375 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1566-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1566-1